Legal Opinion

Amirentezam v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 5, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2019-2066Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ARDESHIR AMIRENTEZAM, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 1:19-cv-02066 (EGS/GMH) ) THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Anoushiravan Amirentezam (“Anoush”), Ardeshir Amirentezam (“Ardeshir”), and Elham Entezam Breuer (“Elham”) (together, “Plaintiffs”) are the children of Abbas Amir-Entezam (“Amir-Entezam”), a former Iranian diplomat and businessman. They bring this action under the state sponsor of terrorism…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Portia Surtain v. Hamlin Terrace FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API