Legal Opinion

Dayton v. Horstman

Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 22, 1957No. 112068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By McBRIDE, J.:

This action is one in mandamus to command the officers of the Board of Elections to hold a municipal primary for the selection of six candidates for the City Commission according to the Charter of the City of Dayton. An alternative writ of mandamus was allowed returnable at 2:00 P. M. on July 22nd, 1957 requiring the defendants to proceed or show cause why they have not done so.

Subsequently a demurrer was filed. The demurrer tests the sufficiency of the petition and submits the legal question as to whether a municipal primary is required under the circumstances set forth…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. Brody v. PeltierOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Froelich v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Jackson v. HorstmanMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API