Farant Investment Corp. v. Francis

Sims, P.,

after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court:

There is but one assignment of error which raises the single question upon the decision of which the result in the case turns, and that question is this:

*4261. Does it appear on the face of the proeedings in the suit for the sale of infant’s lands above mentioned that the court had jurisdiction to enter the decree which directed the conveyance of the lands in the declaration mentioned to one Farant, so that such decree (and also the conveyance) was not void, but valid, and hence by virtue thereof an…