Legal Opinion
Jermia Chaidy v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 2, 2012No. 11-3177UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Jermia Chaidy petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “the Board”) affirming a decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”), which denied Chaidy’s application for adjustment of status on the ground that Chaidy failed to prove his lawful admission to the United States. Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that Chaidy is ineligible for adjustment of status, we DENY the petition.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
After Chaidy was served with a Notice to Appear in April 2008, he gave the IJ the following account of his entry…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Jagubhai Naranbhai Patel, Vanitaben Thakorbhai Patel v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Shan Sheng Zhao v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Mohamed Haider v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Ramirez-Canales v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adeyanju v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Wen Zhong Li v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016