Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Abercrombie

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1932No. 21821PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. In tlie operation of a railroad-train at a public crossing, it is the duty of the engineer, under the statute, “to keep and maintain a constant and vigilant lookout along the track ahead of said engine, and [he] shall otherwise exercise due care in approaching said crossing, in order to avoid doing injury to any person or property which may be on such crossing, or upon the line of said railway at any point within fifty feet of such crossing.” Ga. E. 1918, p. 212, § 2. Under the same statute, it is the engineer’s further duty to exercise due care in so controlling the movements of his train…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FaustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. CapeleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cone v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Earl v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Jackson v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API