Legal Opinion
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Faust
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 21, 1923No. 13986PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
This was a suit for damage to an automobile, occasioned by a collision with the defendant’s cars at a public road crossing in the city of texington. A judgment for $1,000 was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant excepts to the overruling of its motion for new trial. Held:
1. The evidence authorized, but did not demand, the finding in the plaintiff’s favor.
2. By the provisions of the act approved August 19, 191£, it is the duty of an engineer operating a locomotive engine within the corporate limits of cities, towns, and villages to signal the approach of the train to a crossing by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Comer v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fort Wayne National Bank v. ScherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Elk Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Globe Motors, Inc. v. NoonanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.