Annie Rodman v. Gina Bright and Patrick Hildebrand

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANNIE RODMAN, No. 2:25-cv-1178-DAD-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 GINA BRIGHT and PATRICK HILDEBRAND, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which was accordingly referred to the 19 undersigned. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), 20 which was granted. ECF No. 3 at 3. The undersigned issued a screening order pursuant to 21 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and concluded that Plaintiff’s Complaint was legally deficient for failure to 22…