Harris v. Skanska USA Building Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE 7 QUINTE HARRIS, an individual, CASE NO. C22-555RSM 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO v. AMEND 10 SKANSKA USA BUILDING INC., 11 SKANSKA BALFOUR BEATTY JV, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and 12 BALFOUR BEATTY CONSTRUCTION, corporations, 13 Defendants. 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Microsoft’s Motion to Dismiss under 16 Rule 12(b)(6). Dkt. #23. Plaintiff Quinte Harris opposes the Motion. Dkt. #31. The Court has 17 determined oral argument is unnecessary.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.