Gramanz v. T-Shirts & Souvenirs, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*480OPINION
2Per curiam
The primary thrust of this appeal challenges an award of damages arising from the breach of a non-competition clause in a contract. Also challenged were the district court’s findings that appellant breached the parties’ covenant not to compete and that the parties’ agreements prohibited appellant from selling his stock until the debt of respondent T-Shirts and Souvenirs, Inc. is retired. We conclude that only nominal damages are warranted because no evidentiary basis exists for the $345,000 damages award entered by the district court. In all other respects we affirm the judgment…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Advent Systems Limited, in No. 90-1069 v. Unisys Corporation, in No. 90-1070Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Mort Wallin of Lake Tahoe, Inc. v. Commercial Cabinet Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Mahban v. MGM Grand Hotels, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Crank v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1984
4Cited by14 opinions
- Frantz v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- J.J. Industries, LLC v. BennettNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Avis Rent A Car System, LLC v. Darron BurrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Avis Rent A Car System, LLC v. Darron BurrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- FRANCHISE TAX BD. VS. HYATTNevada Supreme Court · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.