Legal Opinion

Wright Way Spraying Service v. Butler

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1985No. C-3919PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Wright Way Spraying Service sued Jack C. Butler to recover payments for crop spraying services rendered and chemicals supplied from July 1980 through August 1981. Butler counter-claimed contending Wright Way charged a usurious interest rate. In a non-jury trial, the trial court rendered judgment for Wright Way for $207,000 plus 6% prejudgment interest and 9% post-judgment interest. Wright Way was also awarded $2,000 in attorney’s fees. Butler’s counter-claim for usury was denied. Butler appealed the judgment on two points of error. First, the trial court erred in denying his counter-claim…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Butler v. Wright Way Spraying Service, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. C & C Partners v. Sun Exploration & Production Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  2. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Hill, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
  3. Danziger v. San Jacinto Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Selectouch Corp. v. Perfect Starch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Lakewood Pipe of Texas, Inc. v. Conveying Techniques, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API