Legal Opinion

Miller v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1935No. Sac. 4897PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an action by a taxpayer to enjoin the defendants from paying an insurance premium from county funds. The defendant.trustees, of Ripon Union High School District in 1933 took out a policy of fire insurance on school buildings in the principal sum of $21,000, with the defendant Farmers Mutual Protective Fire Insurance Company of San Joaquin County, a mutual fire insurance company organized under the County Fire Insurance Company Act. (Stats. 1897, p. 439, as amended; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1931, Act 3729; Deering’s 1933 Supp., p. 1720.) The complaint attacks this action as illegal.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. School District No. 8 v. Twin Falls County Mutual Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Skelly v. Westminster School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. People ex rel. Adams v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. SchellstedeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. State v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. CoakleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Public Housing Admin. v. Housing Auth. of BogalusaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  5. Louisville Board of Insurance Agents v. Jefferson County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API