Legal Opinion

Siegler v. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 17, 2019No. 3:18-cv-01681Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SARA ELIZABETH SIEGLER, et al. Case No. 3:18-cv-01681-GPC-MSB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR 13 vs. RECONSIDERATION AND RECUSAL 14 SORRENTO THERAPEUTICS, INC., et al., [ECF No. 134, 142.] 15 Defendants. 16 17 On August 2, 2019, the Court dismissed with prejudice all the claims in Plaintiff 18 Sara Elizabeth Siegler’s (“Plaintiff”) second amended complaint (“SAC”) against 19 Defendants Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.; TNK Therapeutics, Inc.; BDL Products, Inc.; 20 Cargenix Holdings LLC; Prospect…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API