Legal Opinion

Abar v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1936No. Docket No. 123, Calendar No. 39,196PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiffs had judgment for recovery of paving assessments paid by them, on the ground that the highway paved is a boulevard and, under the charter of the city of Detroit, no special assessment for its paving may be levied. Blanchard v. City of Detroit, 253 Mich. 491.

In 1914, Charles F. Lohrman presented to the township board of the township of Greenfield, in the county of Wayne, a plat of a subdivision on which Magnolia boulevard appeared 82 feet wide and 1,000 feet long. It ran from Wyoming avenue easterly to a railroad right of way. It was saved from forming a cul-de-sac on the east by a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Oprisiu v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Theisen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barkley v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API