Legal Opinion

Barkley v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1946No. Docket No. 9, Calendar No. 43,124PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiffs are owners of property in the city of Detroit, south of Grand River avenue, located in Rosedale Park subdivision and Rosedale Park subdivision No. 1. These subdivisions were platted in 1917. Certain north and south thoroughfares therein, which are from 80 to 100 feet wide, were designated and dedicated as boulevards. Both subdivisions at the time were located in the township of Bedford. The several plats were accepted and approved by the township board.

Although no parkways were shown in the center of these boulevards in the recorded plats, they were included when the thoroughfares…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bates v. City of HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Burridge v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Theisen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Wolgamood v. Village of ConstantineMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Barris v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Development Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API