Housing Authority v. Kolokuris
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
The Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta has abandoned all of the grounds of its motion for a new trial except special ground 3, and the sole question for decision under this ground is stated in the brief of counsel for the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta as follows: “When inadmissible evidence is interjected into a trial, may the *870party who did not object to such evidence explain or rebut the effect of that evidence by using similarly inadmissible evidence?” The answer is, “No.” “The admission of illegal testimony on one side will not justify illegal rebutting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woolfolk v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Savannah News-Press, Inc. v. HartridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Candler v. ByfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Stapleton v. MonroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holmes v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Holmes v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Hubbard v. KENNESAW LIFE &C. INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965