Savannah News-Press, Inc. v. Hartridge
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberharot, Judge.
The general grounds are not argued, orally or by brief, and are treated as having been abandoned. Code § 6-1308; Bradham v. State, 180 Ga. 187 (178 SE 446).
Grounds 1 and 2 of the amendment to the motion for new trial complain of the charge of the court in response to the question which the jury submitted, asserting that the charge was argumentative, confusing and misleading to the jury, and that it was not, in its entirety, sound as p,n abstract principle of law.
Keeping in mind that the defendant filed defenses both of truth or justification and of privilege we doubt that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woolfolk v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Henderson v. FoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Ivester v. CoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Savannah News-Press, Inc. v. HarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Stapleton v. MonroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Munoz v. American Lawyer Media, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. John A. Miller, D/B/A Miller & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Pinkston v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- WSAV-TV, INC. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Sweeney v. Athens Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.