Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter came before the court on May 27, 1982. After careful consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel, the affidavits and all other matters in the record, the court denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and grants Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment. The following is a statement of the court’s reasoning and its written order.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In early 1974, Stanislaus Food Products Company (Stanislaus) requested Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG & E)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- John Houston Sellars v. Raymond K. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lowery v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Will v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Deleo v. RudinDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
- Will v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985