Legal Opinion

Mallard v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 2005No. 2-03-279-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE WALKER, Justice.

I. Introduction

Appellant Chante Jawan Mallard appeals her convictions for tampering with evidence and for murder. Mallard pleaded guilty to tampering with evidence but pleaded not guilty to murder. The jury found her guilty of both offenses and assessed her punishment at ten years’ confinement for tampering with evidence and fifty years’ confinement for murder. In five points, Mallard argues that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to sustain her conviction for murder, that the trial court erred by defining transferred intent in the jury charge, that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Branum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  3. Anthony Wilson, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2018
  4. Charles Jefferson Griggs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  5. Charles Jefferson Griggs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API