Legal Opinion

Little Rock & Ft. S. Ry. v. Worthen, Collector, Etc., and Others. In Error to The

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 24, 1887PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

120 U.S. 97

7 S.Ct. 469

30 L.Ed. 588

LITTLE ROCK & FT. S. RY.

v.

WORTHEN, Collector, etc., and others. In Error to the

Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas.

HUNTINGTON and another, Trustees,

v.

SAME.1 Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United

States for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

January 24, 1887.

In the first of the above-entitled cases plaintiff, the Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway, is a corporation created under the laws of Arkansas, and operates a railroad from Little Rock to Fort Smith in that state, running through several counties in its route. The defendants are the sheriffs of those…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huntington v. WorthenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Maryland Classified Employees Ass'n v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. General Motors Corp. v. Oklahoma County Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API