Rushton v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
Appellant was convicted in a jury trial of the offense of indecency with a child. Upon a determination of guilt, punishment was assessed by the trial court at twenty- five years in the Texas Department of Corrections.
Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence in his sixth and seventh grounds of error. 1 The State’s evidence consisted of the testimony of the complainant, (CC), a seven year-old female, and three adults. The adults were the complainant’s mother, grandmother, and a nineteen year-old female relative (Dona Lee). Appellant allegedly forced CC to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Kuykendall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bobo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Steadman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- L.M.W. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Nunfio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.