Legal Opinion
Binder & Binder, P.C. v. Astrue
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 25, 2012No. CV-11-0467 (SJF)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FEUERSTEIN, District Judge.
Binder & Binder, P.C. (“plaintiff’) commenced this action against Michael K. As-*233true (“defendant”), Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”), seeking to recover attorney’s fees relating to its representation of a claimant for social security disability insurance (“DI”) benefits pursuant to Section 206 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406. The parties now cross-move pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is granted in part and defendant’s cross…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Binder & Binder, P.C. v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Binder & Binder, P.C. v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- In re LernerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Binder & Binder v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016