Legal Opinion
Hollobaugh v. Pohl Transportation, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 14, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00495Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON Michael P. Hollobaugh Sr., Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, v. Case No. 3:20-cv-495 Judge Thomas M. Rose Pohl Transportation, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaimant. ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. 25, GRANTING UNTIL JANUARY 14, 2023, TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIM. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Doc. 25. Because Plaintiff resigned his position by announcing that fact to the Ohio Department of Jobs and Family Services and applying for unemployment benefits,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.