Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 16, 2009No. Civil Action 0:08-1911-HFF-PJGPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HENRY F. FLOYD, District Judge.
This case was filed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 action. Petitioner is proceeding pro se. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting that Respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition be granted. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.
The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robert Louis Roseboro v. Sam P. Garrison, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Fernandez-Vargas v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Handley v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Hicks v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Hicks v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Muolo v. QuintanaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Muolo v. QuintanaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.