Legal Opinion

State v. Luker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1994No. 18822PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Judge.

A jury found defendant guilty of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(1),1 and he was *317sentenced, as a persistent offender, to six years’ imprisonment. Defendant appeals.

Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, and the trial court erred in ruling otherwise, because “the alleged dangerous weapon, the scratch awl, ... is a carpenter’s tool and is used for legitimate purposes.... ”

Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence requires this court to determine whether there was sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DulanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. PurleeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. City of Independence v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. DowdyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MacEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API