Legal Opinion

Bertrand P. Tracy Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1985No. Appeal, No. 1617 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

The claimant filed a petition for compensation alleging a work-related hernia and leg injury. The referee found that the injuries were work-related and that the claimant was totally disabled, and the Board affirmed. On appeal, the employer alleges that the finding of a work-related injury was- not based on substantial evidence, and that the finding that the claimant gave oral notice of his injury to his employer was likewise not based on substantial evidence. We affirm.

Normally, where there is no obvious causal connection between a claimant’s injuries and his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Findlay Refractories v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Auto Service Councils of Pa., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Andring v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Ziegler v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API