Legal Opinion
Marano v. Aircraft Braking Systems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 9, 2001No. 5:00CV2286PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GWIN, District Judge.
On February 5, 2001, Defendant Aircraft Braking Systems, Inc. (“Aircraft Braking”), filed a motion for summary judgment [Doc. 26], Plaintiff Maraño opposes the motion. With his opposition, the plaintiff filed a motion to strike portions of a supporting affidavit filed by the defendant [Doc. 31]. For the reasons stated below the Court grants the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. Background
In this case, Plaintiff Maraño says he was fired because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., and Ohio…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Abel v. Auglaize County Highway DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Merhulik v. Weltman, Weinberg, & Reis Co., LPADistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Smith v. City of Union Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Ziegler v. IBP Hog Markets, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002