Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 13, 1905PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery District Court. — Hon. A. B. Thornell, Judge. Action for damages resulted iu judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

One Weyer and plaintiff were walking along a street of Villisca in the afternoon of July 31, 1903, when defendant requested the latter to come up to his office. He did so, and when both were inside defendant locked the door and administered to plaintiff a severe whipping. He had provided a whip for this purpose some time previous, having deliberately decided to have Weyer arrested and to chastise Shoemaker. To the petition claiming damages the defendant -pleaded certain facts in mitigation and also a counterclaim. The, only rulings complained of are the refusal of the court to submit the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  2. Gronan v. KukkuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Ireland v. ElliottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  4. Thrall v. KnappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  5. Parmelee v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Clarence Payne v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Smith v. UpdegraffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Brown v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Gookin v. NorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API