Legal Opinion

Stensland v. Mundt

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1934No. File No. 7700Published

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This is an appeal from an order confirming the order and judgment on taxation of costs of county court in the Stensland will contest. Eleven witnesses were called to testify at the trial, three of them coming from Fargo, N. D.; namely, Cora Stensland, the beneficiary’s wife, Tobias Stensland, his father, and one Ewald Hubig. The trial occupied eight days, and the costs were taxed under our statutes which entitle each material witness *205to $2 per day. The court allowed, also, the regular mileage of io cents per mile to the witnesses, including the three from North Dakota.

Appellant argues that,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hanchett v. HumphreyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1899
  2. Burrow v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1893
  3. Goldsmith v. The SyracuseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
  4. Eastman v. SherryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1889
  5. Pinson v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API