Legal Opinion
Mann v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 27, 2004No. S04A1454PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEARS, Presiding Justice.
Appellant Anthony Mann appeals the denial of his request for declaratory relief that would hold OCGA § 42-1-13, which prohibits registered sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of specified places, unconstitutional. Finding no merit to appellant’s contentions, we affirm.
In March 2002, appellant pled nolo contendere to a North Carolina charge of taking indecent liberties with a child. He then returned to Georgia, took up residence in his parents’ home of 37 years, and began serving a probated sentence. Appellant also registered, as required by law, with the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Georgia Department of Human Services, Division of Family and Children Services v. SteinerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
- Ga. Dep't of Human Servs. v. SteinerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
- Mann v. Georgia Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Solid Equities, Inc. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.