Legal Opinion
The Lomas and Nettleton Company v. William E. Wiseley and Brenda S. Wiseley, and Thomas P. Kasten, Intervening
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 18, 1989No. 88-1452Published
1Opinion of the Court
884 F.2d 965
14 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1124
The LOMAS AND NETTLETON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William E. WISELEY and Brenda S. Wiseley, Defendants,
and
Thomas P. Kasten, Intervening Defendant-Appellant.
No. 88-1452.
United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.
Argued Oct. 4, 1988.
Decided Sept. 1, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 1989.
Lori F. Kaplan, Murray J. Feiwell, J. Greg Easter, Feiwell & Associates, Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiff-appellee.
David A. Brooks, Martin Bedrock, Knox, Ind., for defendants and intervening defendant-appellant.
Before CUDAHY, COFFEY and MANION, Circuit Judges.
MANION,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Marvin Kagan v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Lorain Tolliver v. Northrop CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,670 John Bershad v. Bernard P. McDonough and Cudahy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Ballentyne v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Ellingsworth v. ChryslerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.