Grand River Dam Authority v. Rose
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This is a proceeding in condemnation commenced by Lillie Pearl Rose, hereinafter called plaintiff, against the defendant, the Grand River Dam Authority. A judgment on the verdict of a jury was entered for $540 representing the depreciation in value of aproximately 157 acres of plaintiff’s farm land. Defendant has appealed seeking to reverse said judgment.
So far as necessary the facts, briefly stated, are that defendant concedes an actual taking of 8/10ths of an acre. The land of plaintiff fronted the Neosho river and consisted of two lots, one being referred to as lot 26, the other as lot 27.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Muskogee v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Page v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Stedman v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Oklahoma City v. VetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Oklahoma City v. GarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. BetremieuxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953