Legal Opinion

Olin v. Arendt

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The question presented for decision by the trial of this action, is whether or not the defendants, executors and executrix are individually liable for any deficiency which may result from the foreclosure sale, by virtue of the agreement dated July 28, 1896. This agreement was between plaintiff of the one part and Abraham Cohen, Caesar Casper, Simon Arendt and Frances K. Lipman, as executors and executrix under the last will and testament of Julius Lipman, deceased. - The ■ agreement secured an extension of time for payment of the mortgage debt and thereunder the parties defendants above named…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chouteau v. . SuydamNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Fuller v. ArtmanNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Pinney v. Administrators of JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  4. Wells v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Durand v. LipmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  2. Smith v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  3. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. FrankenfelderNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Cochran v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In re the Estate of DaufkirchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API