Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Schmidt

Richmond County Circuit Court

Decided October 8, 1987No. Case No. A-3057-CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE T. J. MARKOW

The issue before this court is whether the antenuptial agreement entered into by the parties on November 22, 1978, is valid and enforceable. I am of the opinion that it is.

On the morning of November 22, 1978, the day of their marriage, Edward F. Schmidt, Jr. (Edward) and Esther Paz (Esther) executed a premarital agreement (hereinafter, the Agreement). The Agreement provided that in the event of divorce or Edward’s predeceasing Esther, Esther would receive Edward’s residence and certain furnishings therein. In the event of divorce, Edward reserved a life estate in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooley v. CooleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. Little Beaver Enterprises, a Partnership v. The Humphreys Railways, Incorporated, and Hynautic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. Cumming v. CummingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. Stokes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  5. Batleman v. RubinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API