Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 5, 1987No. 1556-85PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENTON, J.

The question presented on this appeal by Samuel Columbus Stokes is whether evidence of a crime seen and seized by a police investigator, who was an invitee in Stokes’ residence, was obtained by a search conducted in violation of the fourth amendment and, thus, tainted a search warrant which later was issued on the basis of the seized evidence. We conclude that the seized evidence was in plain view and was not discovered during a search.

Investigators Jan W. Stem and Thomas Tiller of the Henrico County Police Department were assigned to investigate Samuel Columbus Stokes’…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  2. Conway v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  3. Shearer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
  4. Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API