Stokes v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENTON, J.
The question presented on this appeal by Samuel Columbus Stokes is whether evidence of a crime seen and seized by a police investigator, who was an invitee in Stokes’ residence, was obtained by a search conducted in violation of the fourth amendment and, thus, tainted a search warrant which later was issued on the basis of the seized evidence. We conclude that the seized evidence was in plain view and was not discovered during a search.
Investigators Jan W. Stem and Thomas Tiller of the Henrico County Police Department were assigned to investigate Samuel Columbus Stokes’…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cantrell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Conway v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Shearer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Commonwealth v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.