Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company v. Shaw

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1961No. 39160PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ebesrhardt, Judge.

The well-settled rule in Georgia is that an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board will not be reversed if there is any competent evidence to support it. While the employer attempts to raise issues relative to a pre-existingback injury mentioned in the first award made by the board, there are many cases supporting the proposition that “The original award is conclusive on both the employer and employee as to the extent of the disability of the employee, as found by the [board].” Home Acc. Ins. Co. v. McNair, 173 Ga. 566 (lb) (161 SE 131). E.g., Moore v. American Mut. &c.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Home Accident Insurance v. McNairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Travelers Insurance v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Moore v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  4. Riegel Textile Corp. v. VinyardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. General Motors Corp. v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. SS Kresge Company v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Amos v. American Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API