Legal Opinion

United States v. Pablo Ochoa, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 12, 2000No. 00-1794PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Chief Judge.

Pablo Ochoa, Jr., appeals his conviction for conspiracy to commit mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. He challenges the government’s use of hearsay testimony at his trial and argues that venue was improper. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the defendant’s conviction.

I. Background

On February 23, 1995, defendant Pablo Ochoa, Jr., who lived in Chicago Heights, Illinois, purchased a 1995 Buick Roadmas-ter for $32,635. Because he traded in two cars on which he had a negative equity position, he paid approximately $7000 more than the Roadmaster was actually worth.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Gurmeet Singh DhinsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. People v. StechlyIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. United States v. Alan N. ScottCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Guy J. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API