Legal Opinion

Stachlowski v. Stach

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1990No. 899DC887Published

1Opinion of the Court

391 S.E.2d 849 (1990)

Daniel STACHLOWSKI,

v.

Carol STACH.

No. 899DC887.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 5, 1990.

John W. Lunsford, Roxboro, for plaintiff, appellant.

Nancy McKenzie Kizer and J. Kevin Moore, Durham, for defendant, appellee.

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff argues on appeal that the district judge abused his discretion by failing to modify the Washington State custody order because of "substantial and material changes in circumstances" affecting the welfare of the children. We do not even consider the merits of this contention, however, because plaintiff failed to give timely…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Booth v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Barringer & Gaither, Inc. v. WhittentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Patel v. Mid Southwest ElectricCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Stachlowski v. StachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API