Legal Opinion

Barringer & Gaither, Inc. v. Whittenton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1974No. 7425DC357PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendants contend the purported judgment is void because a separate order was not entered directing the clerk to file Judge Sigmon’s judgment and because no notice of the filing was given to defendants by the clerk.

It would seem that defendants are contending that not only must a trial judge sign a judgment when not rendered in open court, but he must also prepare a separate order directing the clerk to file the judgment which he has signed. In our view, the signing of a judgment by the trial judge requires no further directive. It is the clerk’s duty to file such…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stachlowski v. StachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Ives v. Real-Venture, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. In re HawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. John T. Council, Inc. v. Balfour Products Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Landin Ltd. v. Sharon Luggage, Ltd., of Greensboro, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API