Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Washington-Alaska Bank v. Stewart

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1911No. 1,818PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

Were several causes of action improperly united in the amended complaint? The Code of Alaska (Code Civ.Proc. § 84) provides that the plaintiff may unite several causes of action in the same complaint when they all arise out of:

“First: Contracts express or implied; or
“Second: Injuries with or without force to the person ; or
“Third: Injuries with or without force to property; or
“Fourth: Injuries to character; or
“Fifth: Claims to recover real property with or without damages for the withholding thereof; or
“Sixth: Claims to recover personal property, with or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Katzenstein v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. State v. Yellow Jacket Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1879
  3. State Ex Rel. Maggett v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Inhabitants of Bath v. Inhabitants of FreeportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. Schuyler National Bank v. BollongNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Bank of Paden v. LanamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Yates v. First Nat. Bank of Mill CreekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API