Legal Opinion

United States v. Billups

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 31, 1981No. Crim. 80-146-NPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Senior District Judge.

At the oral argument with respect to defendant’s post-trial motions heard on August 4, 1981, the Court deferred ruling on certain of said motions to permit further time to research the questions presented. They are as follows:

COUNT I — Hobbs Act — Effect on Commerce

Defendant argues that the evidence is insufficient in two respects to sustain his conviction on Count 1 for violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951: the government failed to show either sufficient effect on interstate commerce or fear of economic loss amounting to…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Guss v. Utah Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. Larry W. MastersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald Benton ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  2. State v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Jose Ramon Aispuro v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
  4. United States v. Hosam Mohammed ZakariaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API