Standard Oil Development Co. v. James B. Berry Sons Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In the court below the Standard Oil Development Company charged James B. Ber*387ry Sons Company, Inc., with infringement of claims 10, 11, and 12 of patent No. 1,-756,032, applied for June 8, 1922, and granted April 29, 1930, to N. E. Loomis, for “art of continuous distillation,” and claims 1-4 of patent No. 1,746,198, applied for June 22, 1924, and granted February 4, 1930, to Loomis and Lewis for “vacuum distillation and rectification of paraffin distillate.” After final hearing that court, in an opinion reported in (D.C.) 14 F.Supp. 881, dismissed plaintiff’s bill.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hansen v. SlickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Hestonville, M. & F. Pass. Ry. Co. v. McDuffeeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Lovell v. Seybold Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- Standard Oil Development Co. v. James B. Berry Sons' Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
3Cited by10 opinions
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. Beckwith MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Daniel v. O. & M. Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1952
- American Cyanamid Co. v. Hercules Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.