Legal Opinion
Russo v. Hardy
New York City Family Court
Decided February 3, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph T. Pilato, J.
This is a motion of petitioner, Monroe County Department of Social Services, to quash a subpoena duces tecum in a paternity case. The Department of Social Services instituted a filiation proceeding against “ X ” alleging that he was the father of a child born to u Y ”. The records subpoenaed were the Department of Social Services records concerning assistance being given to the mother as and for support and maintenance of her son and more particularly, such records containing statements by mother concerning parentage of her son.
The Department of Social Services argues that the subpoena be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re ClearNew York City Family Court · 1969
- In re WalshNew York City Family Court · 1970
- In re the Estate of MellionNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
- Turner v. BarbaroNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- In re ScottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Addie W. v. Charles U.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Margaret B. v. Gilbert W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Humphrey v. NordenNew York City Family Court · 1974