Legal Opinion

Lowe v. City of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1935No. Civ. 1159PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARDEN, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife. On July 9, 1933, plaintiff Ruth A. Lowe was driving a model T Ford automobile in a westerly direction on Logan Avenue between Thirty-eighth and Thirty-seventh Streets in the city of San Diego. Logan Avenue is not paved at the place in question. An opening had been made in the street by defendant at a point about 14 feet north of the south curb line of Logan Avenue in front of 3761 Logan Avenue, to make repairs to a water service pipe. Thereafter dry dirt was placed in the excavation and damp dirt placed on top to a height of about five…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Lawrence v. GoodwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Straten v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Hagenah v. BidwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Hughes v. Warman Steel Casting Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finney v. WiermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Fietz v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Newson v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. West v. LaurenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API