Legal Opinion
Rissman Hendricks & Oliverio, LLP v. MIV Therapeutics Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 28, 2012No. C.A. No. 11-10791-MLWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought by plaintiff Rissman, Hendricks, & Oliverio, LLP (“Rissman”) against defendants MIV Therapeutics, Inc. (“MIV”), MIV Scientific Holdings Ltd., Biosync Scientific PVT, Alan P. Lindsay, Patrick McGowan, and Chris Xunan Chen. Rissman, a Massachusetts law firm, alleges that defendants owe it $416,309.00 for legal services provided to MTV between May 29, 2008 and February 7, 2011.
The case was originally brought in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. It was removed to the United States District…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cutler Associates, Inc. v. Palace Construction, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Grice v. VIM Holdings Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Malden Transp., Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Malden Transportation, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017