Legal Opinion

Leibowitz v. Berry

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1931No. Docket Nos. 7724, 7723PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

The above-entitled actions, though separate in record, as far as pleadings, findings and judgments appear, were consolidated for trial in the court below. On the appeal both actions are heard on one set of briefs and both involve identical points. There was, as indicated, but one trial and the issues involved in both cases are to be determined from the. same evidence. The first action was instituted to foreclose a lien upon certain real estate owned by the defendants therein. These same defendants subsequently brought the second action to quiet the title to their property…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Union Lumber Co. v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hughes Brothers v. HooverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Otto v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Chatsworth Park, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Borello v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Kerby v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Cohen v. ChenowthDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
  5. Day v. GEICO Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API