Legal Opinion

Radonich v. Pine Hill Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1945No. Appeals, 73 and 71PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case the claimant, Nicko Radonich, filed a petition against the Pine Hill Coal Company for compensation under the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act and its amendments (Act of June 21,1939, P. L. 566, 77 PS secs. 1101-1112). At the first hearing the referee found that the claimant was totally disabled and awarded compensation. On appeal to the board, the board vacated and set aside the findings of fact of the referee and remanded the record for further hearing, the purpose being to hear testimony from an impartial medical expert and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Behanna v. MeyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Shemanchick v. M. & S. Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Wilk v. the Budd CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Davis v. Midvale Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Thatch v. SUPERIOR ZINC COMPANYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API