Legal Opinion

Rosenberg Brothers & Co., Inc., a Corporation, Arnold-Hoover, Incorporated, a Corporation v. Albert Arnold

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 10, 1960No. 16762PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Per curiam

In view of the extreme liberality generally in favoring amendments to pleadings under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the general policy thereunder of wrapping in one bundle all matters concerning the same subject matter, we hold it was error not to let appellant’s amended counterclaim stay in the pleadings.

The appellee says the counterclaim is “delay” and “more delay.” The trial court perhaps was so impressed. If henceforward the appellant-defendant should be guilty of delaying tactics, the trial court has a number of available sanctions. And, in view of the leniency in permitting…

2Cited by88 opinions

  1. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Edward G. Eldridge v. Sherman BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Hiram WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Sierra Club, a California Non-Profit Corporation v. Union Oil Company of California, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Spartan Grain & Mill Co. v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API