Legal Opinion

Kruchowski v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1935No. 30,504PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

The plaintiff insists that this order is not appealable. The question is no longer an open one in this court. True, the order here involved is one granting a new trial, but it comes squarely within the rule laid down in Ayer v. C. M. St. P. P. R. Co.189 Minn. 359, 249 N.W. 581, 582. There, as here, a judgment had been entered below after an appeal to this court, and the order granting the new trial vacated the judgment. We there said [189 Minn. 361]:

"An order granting a new trial after judgment has been entered vacates the verdict and judgment, and that result follows even though the motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ayer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kruchowski v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API