Legal Opinion

Chesney v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1912No. 3520PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Brror from District Court, Wagoner County; R. C. Allen, Judge. Mandamus by M. M. Jones against Thomas A. Chesney, City Clerk. Writ awarded, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the district court of Wagoner county. M. M. Jones, defendant in error, filed his petition praying for a writ of mandamus directed to T. A. Ches-ney, as city clerk, to certify that the recall petitions filed by plaintiff, praying for the recall- of J. B. Cook, mayor of the city of Wagoner, H. E. Beardsley, commissioner of streets, alleys, health, and public property of said city, and R. R. Harrison, commissioner of light, water, and sewerage of said city, were suf ficient, and requiring him to file the said petitions with the mayor and commissioners of said city…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dunham v. ArderySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Morehead v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Peed v. GreshamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Opinion No. (1989), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API