Legal Opinion

Clarence Eugene Middlebrooks, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1974No. 73-4033PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:

This appeal from the denial of a federal prisoner’s motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 presents the question whether this Court’s apparent reliance on erroneous information contained in the government’s brief so affected its decision to affirm the defendant’s conviction on direct appeal that the defendant was denied due process of law. We affirm the denial of the defendant’s section 2255 motion.

The defendant, Clarence Eugene Mid-dlebrooks, Jr., was convicted of sixteen (16) counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, following a jury trial in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Demetri Thor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. William Phillip Taylor v. United States of America, No. 74-3130 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API